Difference between revisions of "Registration"

From California PowerSchool User Group
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== InfoSnap Challenges == One district reported a rocky implementation of InfoSnap, with an implementation manager that wasn't familiar enough with PowerSchool. === Strategie...")
 
 
Line 14: Line 14:
 
*GOOD IMPLEMENTATION is the key
 
*GOOD IMPLEMENTATION is the key
 
*Fullerton pushed out InfoSnap to 28 schools this year. Testimonial that it is a good product. Improvements since the PowerSchool acquisition are evident.
 
*Fullerton pushed out InfoSnap to 28 schools this year. Testimonial that it is a good product. Improvements since the PowerSchool acquisition are evident.
 +
 +
[[Category: Contents]]

Latest revision as of 14:07, 25 July 2018

InfoSnap Challenges

One district reported a rocky implementation of InfoSnap, with an implementation manager that wasn't familiar enough with PowerSchool.

Strategies:

  • Allow a lot of time
  • KNOW Your data, use a dataset you are familiar with
  • Test with a bogus account
  • Test on a test server
  • Inspect the data coming in
  • Valley created parallel extended fields to import into and a customization to compare and copy the fields over.
  • Similar experiences with SchoolMint.
  • SchoolTechnologyLeadership.com - survey results of California schools and the systems they use
  • 2 districts with K12Online working well
  • GOOD IMPLEMENTATION is the key
  • Fullerton pushed out InfoSnap to 28 schools this year. Testimonial that it is a good product. Improvements since the PowerSchool acquisition are evident.